{"id":"01KG8AN1S4SQD8H6WSBZM300FG","cid":"bafkreieqsu7guomup2mt6bwzozndojyqrj3gjrrydszt2dbn3ornbcfit4","type":"chunk","properties":{"end_line":9339,"extracted_at":"2026-01-30T20:48:52.921Z","extracted_by":"structure-extraction-lambda","label":"Chunk 5","source_file":"01KG89J1JSYKSGCE149MH9HF6A","start_line":9279,"text":"Yankees, whose vile brogue still the more bestreaks the stripedness of\r\ntheir Greek or German Neoplatonical originals. That profound Silence,\r\nthat only Voice of our God, which I before spoke of; from that divine\r\nthing without a name, those impostor philosophers pretend somehow to\r\nhave got an answer; which is as absurd, as though they should say they\r\nhad got water out of stone; for how can a man get a Voice out of\r\nSilence?\r\n\r\nCertainly, all must admit, that if for any one this problem of the\r\npossible reconcilement of this world with our own souls possessed a\r\npeculiar and potential interest, that one was Pierre Glendinning at the\r\nperiod we now write of. For in obedience to the loftiest behest of his\r\nsoul, he had done certain vital acts, which had already lost him his\r\nworldly felicity, and which he felt must in the end indirectly work him\r\nsome still additional and not-to-be-thought-of woe.\r\n\r\nSoon then, as after his first distaste at the mystical title, and after\r\nhis then reading on, merely to drown himself, Pierre at last began to\r\nobtain a glimmering into the profound intent of the writer of the sleazy\r\nrag pamphlet, he felt a great interest awakened in him. The more he read\r\nand re-read, the more this interest deepened, but still the more\r\nlikewise did his failure to comprehend the writer increase. He seemed\r\nsomehow to derive some general vague inkling concerning it, but the\r\ncentral conceit refused to become clear to him. The reason whereof is\r\nnot so easy to be laid down; seeing that the reason-originating heart\r\nand mind of man, these organic things themselves are not so easily to be\r\nexpounded. Something, however, more or less to the point, may be\r\nadventured here.\r\n\r\nIf a man be in any vague latent doubt about the intrinsic correctness\r\nand excellence of his general life-theory and practical course of life;\r\nthen, if that man chance to light on any other man, or any little\r\ntreatise, or sermon, which unintendingly, as it were, yet very palpably\r\nillustrates to him the intrinsic incorrectness and non-excellence of\r\nboth the theory and the practice of his life; then that man will--more\r\nor less unconsciously--try hard to hold himself back from the\r\nself-admitted comprehension of a matter which thus condemns him. For in\r\nthis case, to comprehend, is himself to condemn himself, which is always\r\nhighly inconvenient and uncomfortable to a man. Again. If a man be told\r\na thing wholly new, then--during the time of its first announcement to\r\nhim--it is entirely impossible for him to comprehend it. For--absurd as\r\nit may seem--men are only made to comprehend things which they\r\ncomprehended before (though but in the embryo, as it were). Things new\r\nit is impossible to make them comprehend, by merely talking to them\r\nabout it. True, sometimes they pretend to comprehend; in their own\r\nhearts they really believe they do comprehend; outwardly look as though\r\nthey _did_ comprehend; wag their bushy tails comprehendingly; but for\r\nall that, they do not comprehend. Possibly, they may afterward come, of\r\nthemselves, to inhale this new idea from the circumambient air, and so\r\ncome to comprehend it; but not otherwise at all. It will be observed,\r\nthat, neither points of the above speculations do we, in set terms,\r\nattribute to Pierre in connection with the rag pamphlet. Possibly both\r\nmight be applicable; possibly neither. Certain it is, however, that at\r\nthe time, in his own heart, he seemed to think that he did not fully\r\ncomprehend the strange writer's conceit in all its bearings. Yet was\r\nthis conceit apparently one of the plainest in the world; so natural, a\r\nchild might almost have originated it. Nevertheless, again so profound,\r\nthat scarce Juggularius himself could be the author; and still again so\r\nexceedingly trivial, that Juggularius' smallest child might well have\r\nbeen ashamed of it.\r\n\r","title":"Chunk 5"},"relationships":[{"peer":"01KG8AJTDYVK8J8YE00DK13XV8","peer_type":"chapter","predicate":"in"},{"peer":"01KG89J1JSYKSGCE149MH9HF6A","peer_type":"file","predicate":"extractedFrom"},{"peer":"01KG89HMDZKNY753EZE1CJ8HZW","peer_type":"collection","predicate":"collection"},{"peer":"01KG8AN1S4NX5NM7Y91ZBCR6PM","peer_type":"chunk","predicate":"prev"},{"peer":"01KG8AN1SBNXE9W5PWJ5YPDN6K","peer_type":"chunk","predicate":"next"}],"ver":2,"created_at":"2026-01-30T20:48:57.124Z","ts":"2026-01-30T20:49:24.360Z","edited_by":{"method":"manual","user_id":"01KFF0H3YRP9ZSM033AM0QJ47H"}}